GHG assurance
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Reading a verification the way a verifier writes it.

Reading a verification the way a verifier writes it.

What a verification tests, how assurance levels differ, where evidence gaps appear, and how ISO 14064-1:2018 boundaries and categories are actually applied.

6 articles

In this category.

What a GHG verifier actually examines
GHG assurance

What a GHG verifier actually examines

A verification is a structured examination against stated criteria — not a document review. What gets tested, in what order, and what makes a conclusion possible.

Six evidence gaps that delay verification
GHG assurance

Six evidence gaps that delay verification

Almost every first-cycle delay comes from the same six places. None of them is a calculation error, and all six are fixable before the engagement starts.

Boundaries and categories: reading ISO 14064-1:2018 correctly
GHG assurance

Boundaries and categories: reading ISO 14064-1:2018 correctly

The 2018 edition reports direct emissions plus five indirect categories, and asks you to justify which indirect emissions you included. Inventories still built on three scopes need translating.

What a carbon neutrality claim has to survive
Energy and environment

Carbon neutrality claims under ISO 14068-1:2023

A neutrality claim is not a purchase of credits. ISO 14068-1:2023 requires a defined subject, a quantified footprint, a plan, a reduction hierarchy and offsetting that meets criteria — in that order.

Each article is reviewed on its stated cycle; the last review date appears on the card and in the article header.

Describe the claim — not the service.

Tell us what must be relied on, who will rely on it and by what date. We will confirm the correct programme, evidence requirement and responsible entity — or tell you it is outside our scope.