Traceability
Can every reported value be traced to a primary source, without a person to explain it?
What the plan connects
One document, holding the whole chain together.
The plan connects installation boundaries, production routes, goods and CN codes to source streams, methods, meters, sampling, precursors, allocation, quality controls, data-gap treatment and change management. It explains where the data came from, who approved it, and how it changed.
Readiness questions
Five questions the plan has to answer.
Reconciliation
Do production quantities reconcile to operational and commercial records for the same period?
Instruments
Does every meter have an owner, a range and a calibration record that covers the reporting period?
Changes and gaps
Are changes and data gaps approved, documented and reproducible by someone else?
Route mapping
Is every good linked to the correct production route, and every route to the correct source streams?
Ownership
Is there a named data owner for each source stream, and does that person exist in the organisation today?
A common failure
The plan that describes a plant that no longer exists.
The most frequent finding in monitoring-plan review is not a wrong method — it is a plan that was written once, approved, and then left behind by the plant. A new meter, a fuel switch, a debottlenecking project or a change in the co-product split all invalidate parts of the plan. Change management is not administrative housekeeping here; it is the difference between a plan that can be verified and one that cannot.
CBAM accreditation status: our application has been formally accepted by ACCREDIA and the assessment is underway. Accredited CBAM verification will be offered only after formal accreditation is granted and within the approved scope. Full status record
Describe the claim — not the service.
Tell us what must be relied on, who will rely on it and by what date. We will confirm the correct programme, evidence requirement and responsible entity — or tell you it is outside our scope.