Group governance discussion
  1. Home
  2. Trust Centre
  3. Which entity is responsible for what.

Which entity is responsible for what.

Group membership never transfers an accreditation or a certification mandate from one entity to another. This table is the practical answer to “who do I actually contract with, and who do I complain to”.

The comparison

Three entities, eight questions.

Energy Up International LLCGlobal Energy UpExtreme Energy Solutions
ServiceValidation and verification of GHG assertionsManagement-system certificationAdvisory, readiness and training
Contract withEnergy Up International LLCGlobal Energy UpExtreme Energy Solutions
Technical teamVerification team under ISO 14066:2023 competence criteriaAudit team under ISO/IEC 17021-1Advisory team — not a conformity-assessment function
Independent reviewIndependent technical reviewer, excluded from the engagementIndependent technical review before the decisionNot applicable
Final decisionAuthorised decision-maker who neither performed nor reviewedAuthorised personnel who did not participate in the auditNot applicable — no conformity-assessment decision
OutputValidation or verification statementManagement-system certificateReports, systems and training — never a statement or certificate
AccreditationEGAC, certificate 1225009A, schedule 1225009BPublished per programme from official documents onlyNone — advisory is not an accredited activity
Complaints routeTrust Centre complaintsCertification complaintsDirect to the entity
The reading rule: the entity that examines is not the entity that grants, and neither of them is the entity that prepares. If a single proposal offers you all three for the same scope, ask which of the three outputs will be worth anything afterwards.
A practical case

What this looks like in a real programme.

Suppose a manufacturer wants a verified product footprint, an ISO 14001 certificate and help building its data system. Those are three engagements with three entities: Extreme Energy Solutions may build the data system; Energy Up International may verify the footprint only if it took no part in building it and the impartiality assessment clears; and Global Energy Up may certify the environmental management system through its own audit and decision. Three contracts, three decisions, three registers. That is the cost of each output being worth something.

Describe the claim — not the service.

Tell us what must be relied on, who will rely on it and by what date. We will confirm the correct programme, evidence requirement and responsible entity — or tell you it is outside our scope.